School of Information
and Library Science
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
INLS 882 – Research Issues and Questions
[Last Updated: 2019-01-21]
Spring 2019
Meeting Time: 2:00-4:45
Location: Manning 303
Credits: 3
Instructor: Cal Lee
Office: Manning 212
Phone: 919-962-7024
E-Mail: callee [at][ils - DOT - unc DOT - edu]
Office Hours: By appointment
Course Web Site: http://sakai.unc.edu/
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Overview. Intensive and systematic investigation of the
fundamental ideas in information and library science. Exploration and
discussion in seminar format.
The goal of this year-long course is to prepare students to become
productive scholars. Students will be introduced to the range of research
questions and issues that arise in the field of information and library
science, with particular emphasis on the research interests of the current
SILS faculty and doctoral students. The role of both theory and prior
empirical research in generating research questions will be discussed. The
variety of methods available to conduct ILS research will be reviewed.
The class members will participate in reading, reviewing, analyzing, and
discussing, in some detail, relevant research literature in many facets of
information and library science. As we explore each of these areas, you
will be asked to consider how your own research interests interact with
them. Is your research interest fully included in one of these areas? Is
it a combination of two or more of the areas? Is it related to one or more
of these areas, but also brings in the perspectives of other disciplines?
Through our discussion and the assignments, you will have the opportunity
to further develop your own interests in relation to the larger field of
information and library science.
A second goal of this seminar is to assist the participants in being
successful as doctoral students at SILS and as future scholars. This goal
will be addressed by providing opportunities for you to develop particular
research-related knowledge and skills, including:
- Literature searching, managing your literature, and writing a
literature review,
- Peer reviewing, and receiving and giving feedback,
- Project management,
- Research ethics and working with human
subjects/participants,
- Presenting your work in various formats (orally, in a
poster, in a paper),
- Collaboration, including interdisciplinary
collaboration,
- Proposal writing, and
- Data management.
Rationale and relationship to the current curriculum. It is
required that students take INLS 881 and INLS 882 in consecutive semesters
at or near the beginning of their doctoral studies. The discussions in
this seminar will help students identify research questions of particular
interest to them and will provide a context within which initial
explorations of those questions can be conducted.
Special Needs: If you feel that you may need an
accommodation for a disability or have any other special need, please make
an appointment to discuss this with me. I will best be able to address
special circumstances if I know about them early in the semester. My office
hours and contact information are listed at the beginning of this syllabus.
Diversity Statement
"In support of the University’s diversity goals and the mission of the
School of Information and Library Science, SILS embraces diversity as an
ethical and societal value. We broadly define diversity to include race,
gender, national origin, ethnicity, religion, social class, age, sexual
orientation and physical and learning ability. As an academic community
committed to preparing our graduates to be leaders in an increasingly
multicultural and global society we strive to:
- Ensure inclusive leadership, policies and practices;
- Integrate diversity into the curriculum and research;
- Foster a mutually respectful intellectual environment in which diverse
opinions are valued;
- Recruit traditionally underrepresented groups of students, faculty and
staff; and
- Participate in outreach to underserved groups in the State.
The statement represents a commitment of resources to the development and
maintenance of an academic environment that is open, representative,
reflective and committed to the concepts of equity and fairness."
~The faculty of the School of Information and Library Science (http://sils.unc.edu/about/diversity)
NOTE ON WRITING IN YOUR OWN WORDS
It is very important that you both attribute your sources and avoid
excessive use of quotes (see separate document called "In Your Own
Words"). Be aware of the University of North Carolina policy on
plagiarism. Your written work must be original. Ask if you have any doubts
about what this means.
All cases of plagiarism (unattributed quotation or paraphrasing) of
anyone else's work, whether from someone else's answers to homework or
from published materials, will be officially reported and dealt with
according to UNC policies (Instrument of Student Judicial Governance,
Section II.B.1. and III.D.2, http://instrument.unc.edu).
EVALUATION AND ASSIGNMENTS
The assignments for the two-semester seminar aim to foster your growth as
a scholar and researcher in information and library science, through
participation in discussions, reviews of current issues and the relevant
literature, and development of research questions and proposals. They
include:
Seminar participation and contributions (20%)
You are expected to complete reading assignments prior to the class in
which they will be discussed. I will be expecting you to be an active
participant in class, remembering that the quality of your comments and
questions is as important as the quantity. Other contributions to the
seminar are also important, such as sharing interesting articles you have
read, things you have learned, or questions to which you do not know the
answer. As a researcher, you are expected to express opinions, as well as
the reasons and evidence for them.
Seminal works; inspirational works/events (10% total, 5% for each)
As we read and discuss important topics in library and information
science this year, we will have the task of exploring each area’s
underlying theories, the methods used, and current work in the area. We’ll
increase our exposure to these research areas through your contributions.
Each semester, each student will be expected to select, read, and report
on (a) one seminal work and (b) one inspirational work or event, in the
context of a class discussion.
Rewrite of INLS 881 Final Paper: Developing your own research interests
in relation to specific aspects of the field (10%) [Due: February 8 at
5pm]
For this assignment, you will rewrite your analytical literature review
focused very specifically on your own research interests from last semester.
You should again include a brief prospectus for a study that you’d like to
conduct as a preliminary look at your research area. The introduction and
literature review of the paper should provide a rationale for conducting the
study; the prospectus should provide a brief explanation of how the study
will be carried out.
Evaluation criteria
The paper should be approximately 5-7 pages, single-spaced, plus references;
the prospectus portion should be approximately 1-2 pages.
The criteria used to evaluate your final product will be similar to the
criteria routinely applied to research proposals. These include the
significance of the question/problem to the field, the adequacy of the
citations to previous work, the feasibility, validity and logic of your
plans for a study, and the organization, clarity, and style of your
presentation.
Seminal works
A seminal work is one that initiates a new area of research – it might
propose a different way of understanding some phenomenon and/or be a
ground-breaking empirical study. In all cases, it was work that later
scholars built upon fruitfully. For the purposes of this assignment, any
article that was published prior to 1998, that has been cited more than 50
times, and that you believe was important to the development of the field
is eligible.
Read a seminal article of your choosing. Are there issues or questions
from the literature we discussed that built on this work or were informed
by it? In what way is this article still important for current research?
Be prepared to give a brief, informal summary of the selected article and
your thoughts and ideas about it (5 minutes, no slides). You should report
on the seminar work during the section of the course to which it is
pertinent. Send the article citation to the class list by NOON ON
SUNDAY before the class session in which you will present it
(earlier is appreciated), as well as posting the full text in the Forum
section of our Sakai site.
Inspirational works/events
An inspirational article or event may help you develop or understand a
research question, make you think about something you thought you
understood in a new way, serve as the basis for a line of research, model
a particular research method, drive you to demonstrate that the
author/speaker is wrong, or be an example of excellent research.
Select your inspirational work or event (it could be an article, a book
chapter, a web site, a lecture, a video, or a conference presentation). As
soon as possible after you’ve identified the inspirational work or event,
you will share it with us in class.
Please notify me when you’re ready to tell us about this work or event —
why you find this work or event inspirational, and how it is helping you
or will help you with your work. (Note that I am not asking you to
summarize it.) Send the work’s citation or a link to the event’s website
to the class list by NOON ON SUNDAY before the class
session in which you will present it (earlier is appreciated), as well as
posting the full text (if applicable) to the Forum section of our Sakai
site.
Evaluation criteria
This assignment will be evaluated in terms of the selection of the
works/event (i.e., it was important for the field and relevant to the
topic at hand), the clarity of your summation and analysis, and the
originality of your ideas about it. This assignment (seminal work and
inspirational work/event combined) will account for 5% of your grade each
semester.
Looking outward: Understanding the field in relation to your own
research interests (30%)
Throughout the course, we will examine current research questions
(including current studies, relevant theories, and applicable methods) in
a variety of areas.
You will be asked to conduct an analytical literature review in three
of these areas, with a focus on how your own research interests are
related to the area. In each review, you should focus on the literature
in a particular area that connects with your own research interests.
Milestones
You will write a brief description (about 1 paragraph) focused on the
particular facet of our field that the review will cover, along with how
your own research interests connect with that facet of the field. You
will then informally discuss your work with your classmates.
Schedule of due dates
Brief description - due one week before the relevant
class session
Informal discussion in class - on the week of the
relevant class session
Final product - one week after the relevant class
session
Evaluation criteria
Each review should be approximately 5 pages (single-spaced). While the
number of citations included in each will vary, each review should
incorporate at least 20 references. (You’ll likely read/examine more than 50
works for each review, in preparation for writing it.)
The criteria used to evaluate each of your analytical reviews will be
similar to the criteria routinely applied to scholarly literature reviews.
These include the significance of the question/problem to the field, the
adequacy of the citations to previous work, the validity and logic of your
analysis of that literature, the originality of your perspective on past
work and its relationship to your own interests, and the organization,
clarity, and style of your presentation.
Looking inward: Developing your own research interests in relation to
specific aspects of the field (30%) [Due: April 29 at 5pm]
In each of the reviews just described, you are considering a particular
aspect of the field of information and library science, and how your
research interests are positioned in relation to that aspect of the field.
In other words, you’re taking the broad view and positioning your interests
within it. In this assignment, you’ll focus on your own research interests
and try to specify them more clearly, still keeping in mind their position
within the field. In other words, you’ll take the specific view based on
your own interests, and discuss them in relation to what you’ve learned
about the broader field. As you consider the various things that you’ve
learned about these three areas in the first semester, your own interests
will likely evolve. For this assignment, you will write an analytical
literature review focused very specifically on your own research interests.
You should identify a target publication venue (conference
with published proceedings or journal) for your literature review.
Evaluation criteria
The final paper should be approximately 10-12 pages, single-spaced, plus
references.
The criteria used to evaluate your final product will be adequacy of the
citations to and synthesis of previous work; articulation of a specific
area (or areas) of research within that context; organization; clarity;
and style of your presentation.
Week 1 - No Class - (Classes begin on January 9)
Week 2 (January 15) - Intro Week
Week 3 (January 22) - Teaching and Learning; Producing and Maintaining
CVs
Guests: Sayamindu Dasgupta, Gary Marchionini, Maggie Melo
Assigned Readings:
Dasgupta, Sayamindu, and Benjamin Mako Hill. "How 'Wide Walls' Can
Increase Engagement: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Scratch." In Proceedings
of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
New York: ACM Press. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3173935
Marchionini, Gary. "Search, Sense Making and Learning: Closing Gaps." Information
and Learning Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0049
Melo, Marijel, and Antonnet Johnson. "Teaching Technical Writing through
Designing and Running Escape Rooms." Dialogue 5, no. 2 (2018). http://journaldialogue.org/issues/v5-issue-2/teaching-technical-writing-through-designing-and-running-escape-rooms/
Week 4 (January 29) - Information Retrieval and Information Seeking -
Part 1
Guest: Amelia Gibson
Assigned Readings:
Gibson, Amelia N., and Samantha Kaplan. "Place, Community and
Information Behavior: Spatially Oriented Information Seeking Zones and
Information Source Preferences." Library and Information Science
Research 39 (2017): 131-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.001
Gibson, Amelia N., Samantha Kaplan, and Emily Vardell. "A Survey of
Information Source Preferences of Parents of Individuals with Autism
Spectrum Disorder." Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47
(2017): 2189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3127-z
Mostafa, Javed, and Jacek Gwizdka. "Deepening the Role of the User:
Neuro-Physiological Evidence as a Basis for Studying and Improving
Search." In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human
Information Interaction and Retrieval, 63-70. New York: ACM Press,
2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854946.2854979
Week 5 (February 5) - Data Science and Curation
Guests: Arcot Rajasekar, Ryan Shaw
Assigned Readings:
Billah, Mirza M.,
Jonathan L. Goodall, Ujjwal Narayan, Bakinam T. Essawy, Venkat Lakshmi,
Arcot Rajasekar, and Reagan W. Moore. "Using a Data Grid to Automate Data
Preparation Pipelines Required for Regional-Scale Hydrologic Modeling." Environmental
Modelling and Software 78 (2016): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.010
Marchionini, Gary. "Information Science Roles in the Emerging Field of
Data Science." Journal of Data and Information Science 1, no. 2
(2016): 1-6. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jdis/1/2/article-p1.xml
Rajasekar, Arcot, John Orcutt, and Frank Vernon. "Workflow-Oriented
Cyberinfrastructure for Sensor Data Analytics." In iRODS User Group
Meeting 2017 Proceedings, 23-34. Chapel Hill, NC: iRODS Consortium,
2017. [Sakai]
Shaw, Ryan. "Big Data and Reality." Big Data and Society
(July-December 2015). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951715608877
Other Related Readings:
Tibbo, Helen R. "Digital Curation Education and Training: From
Digitization to Graduate Curricula to MOOCs." International Journal of
Digital Curation 10, no. 1 (2015): 144-53. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.352
Week 6 (February 12) - Information Retrieval and Information Seeking -
part 2
Guests: Jaime Arguello, Rob Capra
Assigned Readings:
Arguello, Jaime. "Aggregated Search." Foundations and Trends in
Information Retrieval 10, no. 5 (2017): 365-502. [Introduction:
366-383] https://ils.unc.edu/~jarguell/ArguelloFNTIR2017
Arguello, Jaime, Bogeum Choi, and Robert Capra. "Factors Influencing Users’
Information Requests: Medium, Target, and Extra-Topical Dimension." ACM
Transactions on Information Systems 36, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209624
Shah, Chirag, Rob Capra, and Preben Hansen. "Research Agenda for Social and
Collaborative Information Seeking." Library and Information Science
Research 39 (2017): 140-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.005
Week 7 (February 19) - Telling Stories - Verbally and Visually
Guest: David Gotz, Brian Sturm
Assigned Readings:
Gotz, David, Wenyuan Wang, Annie T. Chen, and David Borland. "Visualization
Model Validation Via Inline Replication." Information Visualization
(forthcoming). http://gotz.web.unc.edu/files/2018/12/gotz_iv_inline_replication_preprint.pdf
Guo, Shunan, Zhuochen Jin, David Gotz, Fan Du, Hongyuan Zha, and Nan Cao.
"Visual Progression Analysis of Event Sequence Data." IEEE Transactions
on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, no. 1 (2019): 417-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864885
Nelson, Sarah Beth, and Brian William Sturm. "Storytelling." In Encyclopedia
of Library and Information Sciences, 4437-46. New York: Taylor and Francis,
2017. [Sakai]
Week 8 (February 26) - Social Networks and Social Media - Part 1
(Foundations); Grant Proposals
Assigned Readings:
Eschenfelder, Kristin R., Morgaine Gilchrist Scott, Kalpana Shankar, and
Greg Downey. "Social Science Data Archives: A Historical Social Network
Analysis." IASSIST Quarterly (2016): 6-19. https://iassistdata.org/sites/default/files/vol_40_1_eschenfelder.pdf
Otte, Evelien, and Ronald Rousseau. "Social Network Analysis: A Powerful
Strategy, Also for the Information Sciences." Journal of Information
Science 28, no. 6 (2002): 441-53. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016555150202800601
Scott, Jason. Social Network Analysis. Fourth Edition. SAGE, 2017.
[Chapters 1 and 5.]
Other Related Readings:
Freeman, Linton C. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study
in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press, 2004.
[See especially Chapter 1.] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239228599_The_Development_of_Social_Network_Analysis
Week 9 (March 5) - Social Networks and Social Media - Part 2
Guest: Zeynep Tufekci
Assigned Readings:
Law, John, and Michel Callon. "The Life and Death of an Aircraft: A Network
Analysis of Technological Change." In Shaping Technology/Building
Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker
and John Law. Inside Technology, 20-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992. [Sakai]
Winget, Megan. "A Meditation on Social Reading and Its Implications for
Preservation." Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture 42, no.
1 (2013): 1-14. [Sakai]
Wu, Yingcai, Nan Cao, David Gotz, Yap-Peng Tan, and Daniel A. Keim. "A
Survey on Visual Analytics of Social Media Data." IEEE Transactions on
Multimedia 18 (2016): 2135-48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2614220
Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of
Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.
[Specifically: Introduction - xx-xxxi] https://www.twitterandteargas.org/downloads/twitter-and-tear-gas-by-zeynep-tufekci.pdf
Week 10 (March 12) - (Spring Break)
Week 11 (March 19) - Library Services to Meet Specific Population Needs
Guests: Sandra Hughes-Hassell, Cliff Missen, Casey Rawson
Assigned Readings:
Fahia,Saeed. "Using Digital Libraries to Overcome Information Famine." University
World News, January 11, 2019. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20190104131328871
Hughes-Hassell, Sandra, Pauletta Brown Bracy, and Casey H. Rawson, eds.
Libraries, Literacy and African American Youth: Research and Practice. Santa
Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2017. [Ethnic and Racial Development in
African Amercan Youth (49-62), Characteristics of Effective Library Services
for African American Youth (103-117)]. [Sakai]
Miner, Edward A., and Cliff Missen. "'Internet in a Box': Augmenting
Badwidth with the Egranary Digital Library." Africa Today 52, no. 2 (2005):
21-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/at.2006.0012
Philbin, Morgan M., Caroline M. Parker, Mary Grace Flaherty, and Jennifer S.
Hirsch. "Public Libraries: A Community-Level Resource to Advance Population
Health." Journal of Community Health (forthcoming). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0547-4
Week 12 (March 26) - Conceptualizing Information Artifacts and Systems
Guests: Melanie Feinberg, Colin Post, Ryan Shaw
Assigned Readings:
Feinberg, Melanie. "Reading Databases: Slow Information Interactions Beyond
the Retrieval Paradigm." Journal of Documentation 73, no. 2 (2017):
336-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2016-0030
Feinberg, Melanie. "Material Vision." In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM
Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing,
604-17. New York: ACM Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998204
Lee, Christopher A. “Digital Curation as Communication Mediation.” In Handbook
of Technical Communication, edited by Alexander Mehler, Laurent
Romary, and Dafydd Gibbon, 507-530. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2012. https://ils.unc.edu/callee/p507-lee.pdf
Losee, Robert M. "Information Theory for Information Science: Antecedents,
Philosophy, and Applications." Education for Information 33 (2017):
23-35. https://content.iospress.com/articles/education-for-information/efi987
Post, Colin, Patrick Golden, and Ryan Shaw. "Never the Same Stream: Netomat,
XLink, and Metaphors of Web Documents." In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. New York: ACM Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209280.3209530
Week 13 (April 2) - Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Guest: Fei Yu
Assigned Readings:
Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, Gabriela Philips, Will Sutherland, Steve Sawyer,
and Ingrid Erickson. "Personalization of Knowledge, Personal Knowledge
Ecology, and Digital Nomadism." Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology, forthcoming. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327172717_Personalization_of_Knowledge_Personal_Knowledge_Ecology_and_Digital_Nomadism
Mosaly, Prithima Reddy, Lukasz M. Mazur, Fei Yu, Hua Guo, Merck Derek, David
H. Laidlaw, Carlton Moore, Lawrence B. Marks, and Javed Mostafa. "Relating
Task Demand, Mental Effort and Task Difficulty with Physicians’ Performance
During Interactions with Electronic Health Records (EHRs)." International
Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, no. 5 (2018): 467-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1365459
Wang, Yue, Dawei Yin, Luo Jie, Pengyuan Wang, Makoto Yamada, Yi Chang, and
Qiaozhu Mai. "Optimizing Whole-Page Presentation for Web Search." ACM
Transactions on the Web 9, no. 4 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3204461
Week 14 (April 9) - Scholarly Communications
Guest: Brad Hemminger
Assigned Readings:
Hemminger, Bradley M., and Julia TerMaat. "Annotating for the World:
Attitudes toward Sharing Scholarly Annotations." Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology 65, no. 1 (2014):
2278-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23124
Mostafa, Javed. "Sanitizing Signals in Scholarship and Mass Media: Integrity
Informatics I." Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology 68, no. 1 (2017): 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23839
Priem, Jason, and Bradley M. Hemminger. "Decoupling the Scholarly Journal."
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 6 (2012). https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffncom.2012.00019
Priem, Jason, and Bradley M. Hemminger. "Scientometrics 2.0: Toward New
Metrics of Scholarly Impact on the Social Web." First Monday 15, no.
7 (2010). https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2874/2570
Week 15 (April 16) - Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine
Learning
Guests: Stephanie Haas, Javed Mostafa, Ray Wang
Assigned Readings:
Haas, Stephanie W., Debbie Travers, Anna Waller, Deepika Mahalingam,
John Crouch, Todd A. Schwartz, and Javed Mostafa. "Emergency Medical Text
Classifier: New System Improves Processing and Classification of Triage
Notes." Online Journal of Public Health Informatics 6, no. 2
(2014). https://dx.doi.org/10.5210%2Fojphi.v6i2.5469
Wang, Yue, Kai Zheng, Hua Xu, and Qiaozhu Mei. "Interactive Medical Word
Sense Disambiguation through Informed Learning." Journal of the
American Medical Informatics Association 25, no. 7 (2018): 800-08. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy013
Week 16 (April 23) - Professional and Institutional Dynamics
Guests: Mohammad Jarrahi, Debbie Maron
Assigned Readings:
Maron, Deborah, and Melanie Feinberg. "What Does It Mean to Adopt a Metadata
Standard? A Case Study of Omeka and the Dublin Core." Journal of
Documentation 74, no. 4 (2018): 674-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0095
Sutherland, Will, and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. "The Sharing Economy and
Digital Platforms: A Review and Research Agenda." International Journal
of Information Management 43 (2018): 328-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
I would like to express my gratitude to Barbara Wildemuth and Amelia
Gibson for sharing materials from earlier iterations of this course.