1 |
August 22, 2013 |
Introductions / What is systems analysis? / Models |
Prep:
|
-
Sellen, A. & Harper, R. (2002). The future of paper. In Sellen & Harper, The Myth of the Paperless Office,
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Ch. 7, pp. 185-212.
-
Project specifications
-
Prep slides, Information systems
-
Information systems followup questions
-
Prep slides, Models
-
Hendry, D. (2004). Communication functions and the adaptation of design representations in interdisciplinary
teams. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 123-132.
-
Siceloff, B. (2012). Bell Tower roundabout will be scaled back to a single lane. (Raleigh) News & Observer,
June 5, 2012.
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
- Introductions
- Review syllabus
- Select discussion leaders for case study 1
- What is systems analysis?
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Post at least one message to Sakai discussion boards.
- Discussion leaders for Case Study 1 e-mail me discussion cues by Monday, August 26.
- Everyone else: submit preferences for leading Case Studies 2-4 by Thursday, August 29.
|
|
2 |
August 29, 2013 |
Case Study 1 / Systems Development Life Cycle / Contextual Inquiry |
Due:
|
- Monday, 8/26/2013: Case Study 1 Discussion leader discussion cues.
- Thursday, 8/29/2013: Case studies 2-4 preferences.
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
- Prep slides: Systems Development Life Cycle
- Beyer & Holtzblatt, Chapter 1: Introduction
-
Batra, D., Xia, W., VanderMeer, D. & Dutta, K. (2010). Balancing Agile and structured development
approaches to successfullly manage large distributed software projects: A case study from the cruise
line industry. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, Article
21, 379-394.
-
Case Study 1:
Jaferian, P., Botta, D., Hawkey, K., & Beznosov, B. (2009). A case study of enterprise identity
management system adoption in an insurance organization. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer
Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT), 46-55.
Part 2:
- Prep slides: Problem statements
- Prep slides: Contextual Inquiry
-
Davis, W. (1999). The problem statement. In W. Davis & D. Yen, The Information System Consultant's Handbook:
Systems Analysis and Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Chapter 12, 87-90.
-
Davis, W. (1999). The feasibility study. In W. Davis & D. Yen, The Information System Consultant's Handbook:
Systems Analysis and Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Chapter 13, 91-96.
- Beyer & Holtzblatt: Chapter 2: Gathering Customer Data, and Chapter 3: Principles of contextual inquiry
-
Swan, L., Taylor, A., & Harper, R. (2008). Making place for clutter and other ideas of home.
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(2), Article 9.
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Case Study 1 discussion leader comments due by Monday, September 2.
- Problem definitions due Thursday, September 12.
|
|
3 |
September 5, 2013 |
Contextual inquiry, cont'd. / Project management |
Due:
|
- Monday, 9/2/2013: Case Study 1 Discussion leader comments.
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Reminder: Problem definitions due Thursday, September 12.
|
|
4 |
September 12, 2013 |
Scenarios, Personas, Use Cases |
Due:
|
- Thursday, 9/12/13: Problem definitions
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
- Prep slides: Scenarios and Personas
- Beyer and Holtzblatt, Ch. 5
-
Carrol, J. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43-60.
-
Holtzblatt, K., Wendell, J. & Wood, S. (2005). Rapid Contextual Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Ch. 9, Using Contextual Data to Write Personas, 181-191.
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
- Use Cases
- Group discussion of Storm Tracker exercise
|
Assignment:
|
Timeline for project selection activities:
- I will post all problem definitions to course website by Monday, September 16.
-
Please e-mail me THREE TO FOUR projects that you'd want to work on by Wednesday, September 18, at noon.
Try to consider:
- Your interests: does it sound like a project you'd enjoy?
- Your skills: what can you contribute to this project?
- Your aspirations: does the project provide opportunities to learn a valuable technique?
- The problem: is the project feasible? Will the client be accessible?
- I will limit the problem definition list to candidate problems by noon, Thursday, September 19.
- Review the candidate problems before class on Thursday, September 19.
- In part 1 of our 9/19 class we will select problems and determine project groups.
|
|
5 |
September 19, 2013 |
Project speed dating! / Artifact models |
Due:
|
- Thursday, 9/19/13: Make sure you've read candidate definitions before class!
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
- Review candidate problem definitions.
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
|
|
6 |
September 26, 2013 |
Models, models, models! |
Due:
|
- Thursday, 9/26/13: Information Gathering Plans (one per team).
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
|
|
7 |
October 3, 2013 |
Flow Models / Case Study 2 / Interpretation |
Due:
|
- Monday, 9/30/13: Discussion cues from Case Study 2 group leaders
- Thursday, 10/3/13: Work Model individual assignments
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
- Mid-semester debrief
- Project question/answer
- Flow Models
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Discussion leader comments to be e-mailed to me by Monday, October 7.
- Project Draft Models round 1 to group dropboxes by Thursday, October 10.
|
|
8 |
October 10, 2013 |
Physical, Cultural, E-R, Semantic Models (oh my) |
Due:
|
- Monday, 10/7/13: Case Study 2 Discussion Leader comments (via e-mail).
- Thursday, 10/10/13: Project Draft Models Round 1 (in project dropboxes).
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
-
Case study 3 discussion leaders
submit draft discussion cues to me via e-mail by Monday, October 21.
|
|
-- |
October 17, 2013 |
Fall Break |
In class:
|
Fall break this week. No class!
|
|
9 |
October 24, 2013 |
ER Models, Continued, Data Dictionaries, CRUD, Case Study 3 |
Due:
|
- Monday, 10/21/13: Case study 3 leader discussion prompts, via e-mail.
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
-
Case study 3 discussion leaders e-mail me with group discussion summary by Monday, October 28.
-
ER Model assignment, due Thursday, November 7.
|
|
10 |
October 31, 2013 |
Modeling Practice / Card Sorting / Web Models / Consolidation |
Due:
|
- Monday, 10/28/2013: Discussion leader comments for case study 3 (via e-mail).
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
- ER modeling exercises (to come)
Part 2:
- Prep slides: Web Models
- Prep slides: Consolidation
-
Rosenfeld, L. & Morville, P. (2006).
Information Architecture for the World Wide Web.
O'Reilly. Ch. 10.7.2, Card sorting and Ch. 12.1 - 12.4, Design and Documentation
-
Beyer & Holtzblatt, Ch. 9, Creating one view of the customer. Read pp. 151-163.
-
Beyer & Holtzblatt, Ch. 11, Work redesign.
- Do a "directed skim" of this chapter: skim the text, read and understand all diagrams, captions, and sidebars.
|
In class:
|
I know it's Halloween, but I do expect you to be in class. We get out before 9, so you will have plenty of time for japery afterwards.
In exchange, I'll bring snacks and also I'll come to class in costume. You are welcome to come in costume as well, but this is not required. (You will not be graded on your costume.)
Part 1:
- ER Model practice / open session
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Project draft models 2 and progress report due Thursday, November 7.
- Reminder: Individual ER Model assignment due Thursday, November 7.
|
|
11 |
November 7, 2013 |
Card sorting, web models, user environment, accessibility |
Due:
|
- Thursday, 11/7: Project draft models 2 and progress reports.
- Thursday, 11/7: Individual ER Models.
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
- Prep slides: User environment design
- Prep slides: Accessibility
- Beyer & Holtzblatt, Ch. 15, The User Environment Design.
-
Loiacono, E. (2004). Cyberaccess: Web accessibility and corporate America.
Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 82-87.
-
Loiacono, E., Romano, N. & McCoy, S. (2009) The state of corporate website accessibility.
Communications of the ACM, 52(9), 128-132.
-
Read about the Federal Government's Section 508.
In particular, check out:
You don't have to read each item in detail; but get a sense of the breadth of accessibility
concerns that Section 508 is meant to address.
-
Explore the W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative,
including the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Overview
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
- User Environment Design
- UED example: MS Office products (as whim dictates)
- Accessibility
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Case study 4 leaders' discussion points due via e-mail on November 11.
|
|
12 |
November 14, 2013 |
Accessibility (cont'd), Risk, Change management, Design ethics |
Due:
|
- Monday, 11/11: Case study leader 4 discussion points, via e-mail.
|
Prep:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
Part 2:
- Case Study 4 discussion. (Leaders TBA)
|
Assignment:
|
- Groups prepare for presentations and submit presentation slideshows to group dropboxes by November 21.
|
|
13 |
November 21, 2013 |
Presentations / Wrap up |
Due:
|
Thursday, 11/21: Group presentations to group dropboxes.
|
Prep:
|
Come to class with any final questions or remarks you have about the course.
|
In class:
|
Part 1:
- Final Presentations, order TBD.
Part 2:
|
Assignment:
|
- Final project reports presented to clients and submitted to group dropboxes no later than December 12, 2013 at 7:00pm.
|
|