Average Percentage of and
Basis for Salary Improvement for Full-Time Faculty
2000-2001
|
School |
Percent of Improvement |
Basis for Improvement |
|
|||
|
Alabama |
3.6 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Albany |
4.0 |
Union contract, merit, to
achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Alberta |
7.1- |
Merit, across the board |
|
|||
|
Arizona |
2.0 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
British Columbia |
4.4 |
Merit, across the board,
career progress |
|
|||
|
Buffalo |
11.0 |
Union contract, merit, to
achieve equity |
|
|||
|
California – Los Angeles |
5.9 |
Merit, cost-of-living, to
achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Catholic |
3.0 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
Clarion |
3.4 |
Union contract |
|
|||
|
Clark Atlanta |
0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
Dalhousie |
2.0 |
Union contact, merit,
cost-of-living |
|
|||
|
Dominican |
5.0 |
Across the board, promotion |
|
|||
|
Drexel |
4.5 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Emporia |
4.8 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Florida State |
2.5 |
Union contract, merit,
across the board, cost of living |
|
|||
|
Hawaii |
0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
Illinois |
7.6 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Indiana |
4.7 |
Merit, cost-of-living, to
achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Iowa |
5.6 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
Kent State |
5.0 |
Union contract |
|
|||
|
Kentucky |
2.5 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
Long Island |
5.0 |
Union contract |
|
|||
|
Louisiana State |
4.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Maryland |
6.0 |
Merit, cost of living |
|
|||
|
McGill |
3.5 |
Merit, cost of living |
|
|||
|
Michigan |
3.3 |
Merit, promotion, retention |
|
|||
|
Missouri |
4.0 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
Montréal |
----- |
Union contract |
|
|||
|
North Carolina Central |
5.0 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
North Carolina – Chapel
Hill |
5.5 |
Merit, to achieve equity,
promotion |
|
|||
|
North Carolina – Greensboro |
6.5 |
Merit |
|
|||
|
North Texas |
1.1 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|
|||
|
Oklahoma |
3.0 |
Cost of living |
|
|||
|
Pittsburgh |
3.5 |
Merit, cost-of-living, to
achieve equity, promotion |
|||
|
Pratt |
3.5 |
Union contract, seniority,
to achieve equity |
|||
|
Puerto Rico |
5.0 |
Across the board |
|||
|
Queens |
2.0 |
Union contract,
cost-of-living |
|||
|
Rhode Island |
3.5 |
Union contract, across the
board |
|||
|
Rutgers |
1.5 |
Union contract, merit,
across the board |
|||
|
St. John's |
3.5 |
Union contract, merit |
|||
|
San Jose |
---- |
Merit, across the board |
|||
|
Simmons |
5.6 |
Union contract, merit |
|||
|
South Carolina |
4.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|||
|
South Florida |
2.4 |
Union contract, merit,
across the board |
|||
|
Southern Connecticut |
3.0 |
Union contract |
|||
|
Southern Mississippi |
0.0 |
|
|||
|
Syracuse |
6.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity,
promotion |
|||
|
Tennessee |
5.7 |
Merit, across the board,
promotion |
|||
|
Texas |
4.0 |
Merit |
|||
|
Texas Woman's |
3.0 |
Merit, across the board, to
achieve equity |
|||
|
Toronto |
5.3 |
Merit, across the board |
|||
|
Washington |
4.0 |
Merit, cost of living, to
achieve equity |
|||
|
Wayne State |
3.9 |
Union contract, merit |
|||
|
Western Ontario |
1.0 |
Union contract, merit |
|||
|
Wisconsin – Madison |
8.3 |
Merit, competitive
compensation |
|||
|
Wisconsin – Milwaukee |
4.7 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
|||
|
Average |
4.1 |
|
|||