INLS 210-36: USER EDUCATION

QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT DURING YOUR READING

Summer 1998

July 30, 1998 -- THE LECTURE-DISCUSSION METHOD

Please see notes on use of the Lecture Method in direct instruction.


July 29, 1998 -- BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES, EVALUATION, LECTURES

Reflective Questions:

  1. Consider the differences between evaluating a lesson plan evaluation and evaluating student performance.
  2. What can the instructor do to make the lecture method more involving for students?
Exercise
  1. Take one of your goals or generalized objectives and elaborate it, that is, write enough words so that you know what you have stated explicitly all the aspects you want the students to learn.

  2. Follow the ABCD method to write one cognitive objective from your generalized goal at levels 1, 2 or 3.

  3. Use same method and write one affective objective at level 1 or 2.

  4. If you have the time and it seems important, write one more cognitive objective at levels 4, 5 or 6.

  5. Come back to 214 and write your behavioral objectives on the board.

  6. In class, each group will examine and provide feedback on the work of its members and then report overall results to class.


July 28, 1998 - MOTIVATION, TAXONOMIES, OBJECTIVES, EVALUATION

Reflective Questions:

  1. Why do you think there is so much emphasis in the instructional literature on preparing objectives before the class? What are the advantages? For whom? Are there disadvantages?

  2. Is there value in involving students in preparing the course objectives? Are there drawbacks?

  3. How useful do you find Bloom's cognitive learning taxonomy? How about the affective learning taxonomy? The psycho-motor? Do you see a way to include all the levels of Bloom's taxonomy in preparing objectives for a class? If so, should you? Which of the affective levels do you think would be valuable to include in your objectives?

  4. How might the course objectives you prepare help you in planning an evaluation for the class?

Exercise

  1. For a course or class of your choice, prepare a fairly comprehensive tentative list of topics (and skills) that you might consider including. List the topics in no particular order down the left hand side of a notebook page.

  2. Apply the following two criteria to each topic:
    1. How essential is this topic or skill to the course/class as a whole?
    2. How interesting might the topic or skill be to your learner population?

    One way to do this is to make two columns on your page of topics and skills and label the first "Essential Skill/Knowledge" and the second "Potential Interest." Once you have done this, rate each topic or skill as either High, ? (meaning that you are unsure or that it is neither high nor low), or Low. Rate each topic or skill on both criteria.

  3. Select all the topics or skills that are rated high on both criteria. Consider for inclusion each topic or skill that has a high rating on one criteria. For each topic/skill that you selected, what do you want them to learn?
    1. One or more Definitions?
    2. How to apply?
    3. To promote a critical attitude?
    4. What do you want your learners to be able to know?
    5. What do you want your learners to be able to do?
    6. What do you want your learners to feel following the course/class?

  4. The next step is to consider reality constraints: class time, class size, expectations of time available to learners outside of class time. Then you can begin to formulate objectives. Try to write each one in a behavioral way (i.e., what you will be able to observe as an outcome).

  5. July 27, 1998 - AUDIENCE ANALYSIS, LEARNING STYLES & MOTIVATION

    1. What motivates people to want to learn? What factors may cause people to lose that motivation? See ERIC Digest on Motivation on web site in addition to other readings)

    2. Today in class we will examine a number of ways of categorizing learning styles --

      As a group (although perhaps a nominal group) consider one of the learner populations someone in your group has selected and either apply one of the category systems above (or another from your reading or background knowledge) or create your own 3-4 categories that seem to usefully group your learners according to their expected approach to learning and their preferences for instructional activities.

    3. Based on the category system you have selected, estimate the percent of learners in each group.

    4. Describe the instructional approach (e.g., lecture, discussion, experiment, group activity, inquiry method, etc. or combination) that you think will best fit the dominant group (the one with the highest percentage of learners). Describe the kinds of assignment/activity that this group might find satisfying (e.g., reading, writing short papers, writing a long paper, doing an independent project, working with others on a project, doing in-class exercises, etc.).

    5. Consider the other two groups. How might the learning situation and assignments/activities you describe in 5 affect their motivation to learn the material? Provide some reasons for your answer.

    6. A Challenge: Design a lesson (or a course) to accomodate all the learners whatever their learning style.


    July 23 and 24, 1998 - INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN -- NEEDS ASSESSMENT

    There are many 'step' models for insructional design. For example, LaGuardia uses a 12 step model (see text, p.34); Turner (on reading list) uses an 8 step model. All the models, however, begin with a needs assessment step. Here are some thought questions and mental exercises relating to needs assessment:


    July 22, 1998 - PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION SUPPORT


    July 21, 1998 - LEARNING THEORY

    One way to think about learning theories is to group them as models. One such grouping is the following:

    • How do these definitions of models match the descriptions (and names) of learning theories you encountered in your reading?

    • On what basis (bases) would you select one learning theoretic approach over another?

    • How would you design an instructional session based on each one of these approaches?

    • What motivates a student to learn?

    • Is there a relationship between your beliefs about motivation and your embrace of one learning theory approach over another?


    July 20, 1998 - HISTORY AND CONTEXT


    Evelyn Daniel
    Page revised 7/19/98.