©: Evelyn Daniel, 1997. All rights reserved.
Page revised 7/26/97.

LIS 450RR: GRANTSMANSHIP

TYPES OF PROPOSALS

There are many different ways of categorizing grant proposals. In this course, we distinguished between a letter proposal and a formal or full proposal. The letter proposal is short, often little more than a concept paper with the addition of some statement about fit to the funding agency to whom it is directed and perhaps an expansion of the need paragraph. Foundations, associations, corporations, local businesses, individuals often prefer letter proposals, although sometimes they request a folloup in the form a longer (i.e., formal) proposal.

The second type we are developing in this course is the formal proposal, sometimes called a or major proposal. Although the particular elements and the order of the elements in a formal proposal may differ depending on the funding agency's preference, a full proposal, such as you have been preparing for the course may include:


Another way to characterize proposals is as either solicited or unsolicited. For teaching convenience, we have focused on developed unsolicited proposals in this class (although we flirted a bit with funding sources at the beginning). In practice, however, much of your future grant-writing may be undertaken in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP), that is, a public call for proposals. RFPs specify the need to be addressed and the problem to be solved, usually in general terms. They specify who is eligible to submit a proposal, the form the proposal should take (often the length), the due date, and usually the scope (sometimes in dollar amounts, sometimes in person/years or other way of suggesting a cost amount). They may also specify certain aspects of the solution.

Solicited proposals have the advantage of being expected and desired but the disadvantage of usually facing more competition than unsolicited ones. The nature of the persuasive task will vary depending on whether the proposal is solicited or unsolicited. If solicited, you may need to spend more effort conveying to the funder that you and your organization have the capability to solve the problem, that your approach can serve as a model for others, that it is efficient and effective, but less effort on convincing the funder that there is a need. In other words, you will put more effort into methods, qualifications, and budget in a solicited proposal, while in the unsolicited one, you will probably spend much more effort in convincing the funder that the problem is real and urgent and that it is in the funder's interest to support the request.


Yet another way to group proposals is whether they are internal (that is, they remain within the writer's organization) or external (addressed to some outside agency). The tacit assumption in this source is that you are preparing your posposals for an external agency. In your future proposal writing ventures, you will probably find that you will produce as many proposals internally as you will externally.

For example, every time you request permission from a director, department head, president or provost for funds to support a new service or strengthen existing services, you will be making a proposal. The same persuasive techniques we have discussed in this course are important for internal proposal writing. Generally you will not need to describe your organization or key personnel and you may not need to go into much detail about your work plan and evaluation methods but you will, no doubt, have to persuade the decision-maker(s) that there is a need, that it is urgent (often that it is more urgent than other needs) and that your solution is efficient. This means the budget for internal proposals is often scrutinized more thoroughly than for external ones.


Another way to look at proposals is whether they are individual proposals or team proposals. When one individual can undertake the project and carry it out, then he/she often writes the grant proposal with very little assistance. More frequently, however, the implements and the after-results of a grant will involve and affect many people, in which case, it is probably best to include representatives of these folks from the outset.

When a project is complex and requires the skills of a number of specialists, most organizations assemble a proposal team, with one member assigned coordination responsibilities.

It is probably good practice to plan at the beginning to involve other people in the development of your future grant proposals, especially if the grant is of any size.