BUDGET JUSTIFICATION

Mar. 1, 1998

"Whenever people organize to accomplish desired ends, justification becomes a central social process,"-- Thomas J. Waldhart, "The Process of Cost Justification," Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 10 (1992) 113-127.

The justification process is important because it provides a way to secure the commitment and cooperation of others. Cost justification is concerned with persuading resource allocators that the costs of something are justified by its benefits.

Sometimes, people seek to persuade others by making assertions about the proposed benefits. For example, one might say, "The new system will result in a significant increase in the productivity of the unit's professional staff; it will greatly reduce t he response time of the library; and it will greatly enhance the client's access to information." If the person making this statement has high credibility, then it may be an effective strategy requiring little effort on the part of the persuader. If not, a more rational approach may be needed.

Many economic-based quantitative methods, such as measures of efficiency, cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis, can be used to show that the cost of something is warranted by its benefits. Waldhart argues that analytic methods are not sufficien t and must be combined with a purposeful strategy of persuasion to convince the audience.

Persuasive techniques that are often used include:

Effective persuaders vary the strategies they use based on the situation. Persuasion seeks to change behavior in three ways:

  1. by changing existing responses

  2. by reinforcing existing responses, or

  3. by shaping new responses.

One might cost justify a budget by arguing for an increase in the budget (changing past responses), or argue that current funding levels should be maintained (reinforcing existing responses), or that the needs of the clients require an increase in the budget sometime in the future (shaping new responses).

A stage approach to cost justification would follow the following steps:

Define the Need. The definition of the need for cost justification provides a clear understanding of what the problems are. Objectives of the justification effort should also be developed. Confusion or disagreement can lead to lack of focus, difficulty in selecting the appropriate evidence or the most effective strategies.

Analyze the Audience. The audience for cost justification consists of those folks at whom the persuasive effort is directed -- some may be instrumental, others might be decision-makers. Sometimes the audience is one person; other times it is a number of people with differen t ideas and values. An example of the latter occurs in the justification for purchase of a new system. The professionals and clerical staff who will have to implement the system will have different concerns than the administrators who must provide the fun ds. They will require different arguments from the clients who may or may not benefit from the system. Effective cost justification in this case may involve a number of different arguments based on quite different bits of evidence. It is important to sele ct arguments that are consistent with the beliefs and values of the audience.

Choose the Approach. The systematic assessment of costs and benefits and their comparison provides the basis for the persuasive power of cost justification. In considering these costs and benefits, one has to determine

  • What costs and benefits are relevant

  • How these costs and benefits are defined, compared, and demonstrated

  • Who incurs the expected costs

  • Who realizes the anticipated benefits

Most people think of the cost of something in terms of dollars. Dollars are a useful way of equating different kinds of things, such as manpower, facilities, equipment, supplies, service changes, communication charges, and the like, e.g. the sum of all the resources involved in accomplishing the end. Sometimes cost is the same as price, other times, not.

Costs and benefits may be categorized in the following way:

  • as dollar expenditures or revenues

  • as costs or benefits that can be measured in dollars

  • as costs or benefits that can be quantified but not measured in dollars

  • as costs or benefits that cannot be quanitified.

Costs and benefits are usually expressed in economic terms. When they cannot be, an effort should be made to quantify them to show magnitude of the effect. If effects can be expressed either economically or quantitatively, they can be expressed verball y to assure that they are not disregarded.

Techniques. Some techniques for justifying the budget include