INLS 309:
SEMINAR IN TEACHING PRACTICE

Fall 2000

September 27October 30November 29

All meetings will be "brown bag" sessions from 12:30 to 1:45 in Room 215 unless otherwise specified.

September 27

The topic of our first session will be Evaluation. I'd like to divide the session into two parts. The first part would deal with course evaluations and the proposed new course evaluation system, referred to as the 3-Set Course Evaluation system, developed by the Center for Teaching and Learning. In preparation for this, please go to the link and examine the system and to your email for an attachment containing faculty comments via email about the possibility of using the system and about course evaluation in general.

The second part of our session, if there is time, could be a discussion about evaluation as a critical thinking process using as a focus a case study of five second-year doctoral students. An article about this study by Mary Ann Fitzgerald entitled "the Cognitive Process of Information Evaluation in Doctoral Students; A Collective Case Study" is reported in the most recent issue of JELIS (Journal of Education for Library and Information Science) 41 (3) (Summer 2000) 170-186. A copy will be placed on reserve.

October 30

  

Our topic today is Assignments -- what makes a good one and what makes a bad one. We'll share some of the best and worst we've given or received. If you have time to do a little preparation, you might enjoy reading Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Study Assignments from the Center for Teaching and Learning.

You might find other useful readings from Teaching Tips; Strategies, Research, and theory for College and University Teachers, by William McKeachie. 9th ed. Heath, 1994. His Part II section deals with "Teaching Techniques, Tools, and Methods" and describes writing (papers, journals and reports), reading assignments, lab teaching, field work and experiential learning, collaborative learning, project methods and independent study, teaching with cases, instructional games and simulations, role playing and microteaching, one-on-one teaching and counseling and using electronic learning tools. It's a useful book and fun to dip into from time to time. The book is on reserve for INLS 214 in the SILS Library.


November 29

 

Our topic for this session that will be held in Room 304 instead of 215 is web-based teaching and learning. We'll start with some examples from faculty who have incorporated various kinds of web activities in their classes.
  • Barbara Moran, for example, uses Blackboard, a course container that organizes and provides a unified environment for students (see http://teach.oit.unc.edu:9090/ -- perhaps she'll send us a guest id and password).
  • Barbara Wildemuth has had success in using the discussion board approach in 180 and previously in seminar sessions for fieldwork students (see her course at http://ils.unc.edu/classes/inls180_01_f00/180-home.F00.html and check out the discussion forums.
  • Evelyn Daniel is teaching 131 as an online course for Carolina Courses Online (see http://www.fridaycenter.unc.edu/inls131/ -- I'll send you the id and password via email).
  • Greg Newby and Bert Dempsey and perhaps others use the web for class notes, demonstrations and examples, student projects and the like (see Greg's current course syllabus at http://ils.unc.edu/inls183/index.shtml).
I hope some of these folks will tell and possibly show some of what they are doing.

In addition, in the spring we will offer two new web-based courses. One is entitled Evidence-based Medicine. The online tutorial that forms a part of the course is available through the Health Sciences Library as Introduction to Evidence-based Medicine. The course is being created in Blackboard and can be accessed at http://www.blackboard.com/courses/EBM600/. You may need a password but I think you can enroll as a guest and look at the syllabus and schedule.

The second course is Information Entrepreneurship offered by Tom Miller from NC State and Joanne Marshall as a video course over the UNC 2-way video system. The web site describing previous semesters of the course is available at http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/eep/.

I'm sure other faculty are using these and other web-based tools and hope they will share. The doctoral students may have observed others and may have reactions from a student perspective. Issues surrounding web-based learning and teaching concerning advantages and disadvantages, efficiences and inefficiencies, policy issues for the school and the like should engage us in a lively discussion.

Date revised 11/21/2000.
Evelyn Daniel