INLS
180 Day 5 Notes
January
22, 2002
Big Points
Interaction (and comm.) change states (and info is a
change in receiver’s mental state)
Understanding (information processing) is like
interpreting art
Communication is a specialized, human process
Questions
Do recommendations reduce users’ own processing?
Become dependent?
Do we really change info by accessing it?
What are the cultural/contextual influences on
comm.?
Is thinking communication with oneself?
Data/info/know overlaps and disconnects?
What is 0 time (note it was 0+)? Why is time important since entire range
applicable?
When reading, am I receiving communication from
author or interacting with book?
Information vs news?
Difference between data produced from info and
knowledge produced from info? (scope, linkages)
If a receiver does not understand the data
communicated, does it still turn into information?
We have been discussing underlying abstractions for
basic processes in information science.
We have tried to isolate ‘information,’ ‘communication,’ and
‘information’ from the contexts in which they typically co-occur. One important context is information
seeking, where multiple interaction, communication processes and information
processes/products are coordinated as part of larger problem solving
missions. PP slides
Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous
states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. (Donald Sizemore and
Cynny Scott)
Chatman, Elfreda. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders.
(JASIST online) (Christy Richards)
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in
libraries. (Rebecca Rhodes)
4. One-minute paper
What was the big point you
learned in class today?
What is the main, unanswered
question you leave class with today?