School of Information and
Library Science
University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill
INLS 881/882,
Research Issues and Questions I & II
Fall 2011 & Spring 2012
Syllabus
Course Description / Assignments and Evaluation
Schedule / Assignments / Sakai class site
| |
Instructor: Deborah
Barreau
|
Email: barreau@ils.unc.edu
|
|
| |
Office: 206
Manning Hall
|
Phone: 966-5042
(office), 401-0055 (home)
|
|
| |
Class meetings:
Tuesday, 2:00-4:30; 214 Manning Hall
|
Course
Description
Overview.
Intensive and systematic investigation of the fundamental ideas in
information and library science. Exploration and discussion in seminar
format.
The goal of this
year-long course is to prepare students to become productive scholars.
Students will be introduced to the range of research questions and
issues that arise in the field of information and library science, with
particular emphasis on the research interests of the current SILS
faculty and doctoral students. The role of both theory and prior
empirical research in generating research questions will be discussed.
The variety of methods available to conduct ILS research will be
reviewed.
The class members will
participate in reading, reviewing, analyzing, and discussing, in some
detail, relevant research literature. A part of this process of
examination and discovery is formulating questions, and considering
ways those questions might be addressed. For example, we will be asking
questions about the ILS field and disciplines with which we often
collaborate:
- Where are we going?
- Are there
better/different ways to get there?
- Who gains and who loses?
- What is missing? Why?
- What should be done?
A second goal of this
seminar is to assist the participants in being successful as doctoral
students at SILS. This means that it is very important that each person
has an opportunity to explore and cultivate their individual research
interests as they move through the course.
Specifically, this
seminar has the goal of helping you to:
- Develop a deeper sense
of your research interests,
- Begin to form your own
research agenda,
- Develop critical
reading/thinking skills,
- Consider the role of
research questions, theory, and methods,
- Develop an understanding
of the writing requirements of scholarly communication,
- Develop a sense of
scholarship and academic life in the information field, and
- Develop an understanding
of faculty expectations and program procedures for SILS doctoral
students.
Rationale
and relationship to the current curriculum. It is
required that students take INLS 881 and INLS 882 in consecutive
semesters at or near the beginning of their doctoral studies. The
discussions in this seminar will help students identify research
questions of particular interest to them and will provide a context
within which initial explorations of those questions can be conducted.
Assignments and Evaluation
The assignments for
the two-semester seminar aim to foster your growth as a scholar and
researcher in information and library science, through participation in
discussions, reviews of current issues and the relevant literature, and
development of research questions and proposals. They include:
- Final
product (40%). This product, to be completed by the end
of the second semester, may be a scholarly literature review, a
proposal for a research study or an application for a fellowship, or an
article resulting from a research project. Several intermediate
products will be turned in throughout the second semester: a brief
scope statement, an extended outline, and a presentation of your work.
The final product will be due on the scheduled exam date for the spring
semester.
- Seminar participation
(20%). You are expected to be
an active participant in the class, contributing to both face-to-face
and electronic discussions, sharing interesting articles you have read,
things you have learned, or questions to which you do not know the
answer.
- Interviews with SILS
faculty (5%). Each seminar member
will make the effort to meet and discuss with 5 SILS faculty members
about their research interests,
current projects, and important theories and studies in their areas of
interest. Students will identify faculty members of interest early on,
but will engage in these discussions over the course of the semester.
The product of these discussions will be a 1-2 page
description of the aspects of the faculty members' research interests
that are of interest to the student . Early in the spring
semester, we will discuss some of these relationships.
- Philosophical
presuppositions of your work (5%).Description of
your
background discipline and the theories, paradigms, practices and
assumptions that have influenced your thinking. (Assignment 1)
- Interest group
mini-review (10%). Based on your research
interests, you'll work with one or more of your classmates to explore a
topic in some depth. Your group will be expected to identify articles
for the class to read, and to lead a discussion on the topic. In
addition, the group will write up the review. The interest group
discussions will occur in mid-October; the written reviews are due one
week later.
- Individual mini-review
(15%). You will review the
literature in a specific area that is of interest to you. As with the
group mini-reviews, you will present this review both orally and in
writing. The oral presentations will occur in early December; the
written reviews are due during the fall final exam period.
- Seminal
work and/or inspirational work/event (5%). You will
select a topic that will be
discussed in class (see the class schedule) and identify a seminal
scholarly article on that topic. For the purposes of this assignment,
the article should be published before 1990 and be cited at least 50
times. During the appropriate class session, you will be expected to
give a brief summary of the article and your reactions to it.
OR you may select an article or presentation that has
inspired you or helped you to focus on your research question or that
has helped you to think about an issue in a new way. Students
will schedule their discussion of this work sometime during
the second semester.
Grading. Since this seminar lasts
for two semesters, you will receive an "S" (assuming satisfactory
progress) for the fall semester grade, and a grade reflecting the
quality of your work and progress for the spring (H, P, L, or F).
Throughout the year, you will receive evaluations of your participation
and contributions to the class, as well as of your presentations and
papers.
Honor Code. The
Honor Code, which prohibits giving or receiving unauthorized aid in the
completion of assignments, is in effect in this class.
Schedule / Assignments / Sakai class site