Through its New Parks for a New Century initiative, the NC Division of Parks and Recreation has identified sites in the state - among some of the most treasured and threatened of natural resources - as potential additions to the state parks system. This list of sites is regularly updated through a formal planning process. Important examples of the state's natural diversity are examined using scientific criteria as well as by rating their suitability for recreation.

The current list of 44 sites under consideration includes eight potential state parks, one potential state recreation area and 35 potential state natural areas. A discussion of these different types of state park units is included below. Click here to download the current list of proposed additions to the state parks system. Click here to view a locator map of the proposed additions in pdf format.

Since this process began in 2002, some sites that were
once on the list have been added to the parks system
as state natural areas or identified as state parks. Click below for details of:

Haw River State Park

Mayo River State Park

Newest State Natural Areas

The North Carolina Constitution states, "It shall be the proper function of the state to acquire and preserve park, recreational and scenic areas, and in every other appropriate way, to preserve as a part of the common heritage of this State, its open lands and places of beauty." Further, the State Parks Act of 1987 declares the state's unique examples of natural diversity "are part of the heritage of the people of the State to be preserved and managed by those people for their use and for the use of their visitors and descendents."

Since its creation in 1916 with a single site at Mount Mitchell, the parks system has maintained steady growth through conservation of North Carolina's important lands. As population grows along with demand for an improved quality of life, and as more of these important lands face imminent threat, continued conservation must be grounded in well laid plans.

One North Carolina Naturally is intended as a guide and funding strategy to direct public and private efforts toward well-planned conservation of land and water throughout the state. The conservation plan of the Division of Parks and Recreation, "New Parks for a New Century," is a good fit as a component of that initiative. The parks system is an important partner in One North Carolina Naturally as one of the principal land management agencies in the state.

Adding new units to the state parks system should focus on preserving sites of statewide significance, on ensuring that representative examples of the state's resources are protected and on providing state park services to areas of the state currently underserved.

Why a Conservation Plan is Necessary

The parks system includes some of the state's most beautiful scenery and significant natural resources, but it is far from complete. While substantial financial resources are needed to complete land acquisition and development envisioned in master plans for the existing 32 parks and recreation areas, the addition of new units to the system will be important in coming years for the following reasons:

• The State Parks Act directs the system to include representative examples of North Carolina's archaeological, geological, biological, scenic and recreational resources. Under those categories, specific examples of the state's natural diversity are considered resource themes — such as mountain bog, spruce-fir forest, tidal wetlands, etc. Of 108 resource themes identified in the state, only 29 are adequately represented in the parks system now. Thirteen resource themes have little representation in any geographic region, and four are not represented at all.
• The people in four geographic regions of the state have little access to the park system's recreation resources. Those include: the southern Piedmont in an area surrounding Mecklenburg and Union counties; the northern Piedmont in an area surrounding Guilford and Alamance counties; the far western mountain counties; and the central coastal plain.
• High-quality examples of the state's great diversity of natural communities are being damaged every day as population growth and development infringe on important natural areas. Wildlife habitat is becoming further fragmented and many species of plants and animals are dwindling in number.
• The state parks have experienced record visitation of 13.2 million people. As population increases and becomes more urbanized, more state parks will see visitation at capacity more often. Increased public use can result in damage to sensitive natural resources in the parks and a decrease in visitors' enjoyment of their experience due to overcrowding. Adding acreage to existing parks can help to address these problems, but more parks will also be need to meet future demand.

Carefully selected new state park units will enhance the value of the system as a whole and will help the system fulfill its statutory obligations for future generations.

Types of Units
in the State Parks System

The list of potential new park units includes state parks, a recreation area and state natural areas. As described in the State Parks Act, the system includes six types of units:

State parks, such as Hanging Rock State Park in Stokes County are expected to possess significant natural resource values and to provide high quality recreational opportunities. State Parks are expected to offer developed facilities, but the extent of that development may vary depending on what can be provided without damage to the scenic or natural features. The establishment of any new state park would include the expectation that the park would eventually be open to the public and with some level of facilities provided.

State recreation areas, such as Kerr Lake in Vance and Warren counties, are sites where the primary purpose is outdoor recreation rather than preservation. There is often more intensive development of facilities than in state parks. Protection and enjoyment of the natural resources are still important, and the sites are expected to contain scenic and attractive natural features.

State natural areas, such as Theodore Roosevelt State Natural Area in Carteret County, are intended to preserve and protect areas of scientific, aesthetic or ecological value. Long-term management objectives for a natural area may include little or no public facilities or access. Generally, recreational activities such as camping, swimming or picnicking are not allowed, though some natural areas offer trails and interpretive programming.

State lakes, such as Lake Waccamaw in Columbus County, were placed under the management of the then-Department of Conservation and Development in 1929 and later became units of the parks system. Most of these are administered as part of an adjoining state park.

State trails, such as the Yadkin River State Trail, are established in accordance with the North Carolina Trails System Act of 1973 to help provide for the state's outdoor recreation needs and to promote public access to natural and scenic areas.

State rivers, such as the New River in Ashe and Alleghany counties, are components of the Natural and Scenic Rivers System created by the 1971 General Assembly to preserve and protect certain free-flowing rivers, their water quality and their adjacent lands.

Criteria for New State Park Units

Enlarging the parks system is important, but potential new units must be selected carefully to make sure they fulfill the purposes of the system and that they justify the considerable public investment in acquisition and long-term management.

The Division of Parks and Recreation developed criteria to evaluate potential new units. This provides a scoring system for potential sites as well as a way to remove unsuitable sites from consideration. Each of the following criteria generates a score for a site and those are combined as an overall score for each site.

Four minimum criteria are used for the initial evaluation of sites. Sites that do not meet these basic requirements are removed from consideration. The criteria are:

• Statewide significance of resource themes represented.
• Size — sufficient acreage to protect principal resources and provide appropriate facilities with minimal impacts on those resources.
• Absence of incompatible features such as roads, intrusive development, incompatible vistas and air, water and noise pollution.
• Sufficient access for management and public use.

If a site meets these basic requirements, then scores are assigned for each of these measured criteria:

• Number of high priority resource themes represented.
• Rarity of themes.
• Overall threat to themes.
• Degree of threat to resources/urgency of acquisition.
• Presence of rare and/or endangered species.
• Interconnection with other protected areas.
• Quality of resources and/or presence of a superlative (biggest, best example. unique, etc.).
• Regional demand for parks system units staffed and open to the public.
• Suitability for providing high quality recreation.

Priorities

Using the scoring system, the Division of Parks and Recreation initially evaluated 70 sites, and continues to research important natural areas. They are located in all regions of the state and include a wide variety of natural resources and potential recreation opportunities.

Each of the sites is worthy of preservation, being at least of statewide significance, and each would be an excellent addition to the parks system. Other sites are occasionally "discovered" and can become candidates for the evaluation system.

While the scoring system is a valuable tool to evaluate sites, it alone cannot be used to set priorities. Scoring can be only one component of any decision to pursue acquisition. Other factors can develop or change over time, which can, in turn, change priorities. Some of those factors are:

• Availability of funding through the principal conservation trust funds of the state or in partnership with local or statewide land trust organizations.
• The potential of the site to qualify for special funding such as federal Land and Water Conservation grants or wetlands mitigation programs.
• The willingness of property owners to negotiate for sale. In most cases, it is unknown whether sites might be available for acquisition.
• Local support for a state parks system unit.
• The appearance of an imminent threat to preservation such as impending development.
• Further site research that identifies extremely rare or additional resource themes.

For these reasons, priorities for land acquisition at any of the New Parks for a New Century sites will be established in coming years as planning for new parks continues.