School of Information and Library Science
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

INLS 584, Information Ethics
Fall 2013

Access to Technology

General Discussions of Access Issues

Britz, J.J. (2007). The internet: The missing link between the information rich and the information poor? In Capurro, R., Frühbauer, J., & Hausmanninger, T. (eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethical Aspects in Intercultural Perspective. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 265-277. [Davis - HM851 .L63 2007]

DeMaagd, K., Chew, H.E., Huang, G., Khan, M.L., Sreenivasan, A., & LaRose, R. (2013). The use of public computing facilities by library patrons: Demography, motivations, and barriers.Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 110-118. [UNC libraries]

Epstein, D., Nisbet, E.C., & Gillespie, T. (2011). Who's responsible for the digital divide? Public perceptions and policy implications. Information Society, 27(2), 92-104. [UNC libraries]

Graham, S. (2004). The software-sorted city: Rethinking the "digital divide." In Graham, S. (ed.), Cybercities Reader. London: Routledge, 324-332. [SILS - T14.5 .C93 2004]

Harambam, J., Aupers, S., & Houtman, D. (2013). The contentious gap: From digital divide to cultural beliefs about online interactions. Information, Communication & Society, 16(7), 1093-1114. [UNC libraries]

Moss, J. (2002). Power and the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(2), 159-165. [UNC libraries]

Payton, F. C. (2003). Rethinking the digital divide. Communications of the ACM, 46(6), 89-91. [ACM Digital Library]

Potter, A.B. (2006). Zones of silence: A framework beyond the digital divide. First Monday, 11(5). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_5/potter/index.html.

Prasad, R. (2013). Universal service obligation in the age of broadband. The Information Society, 29(4), 227-233. [UNC libraries]

Ruiz, H. (2008). Hector Ruiz on connecting the world. TED Talk, http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/hector_ruiz_on_connecting_the_world.html.

Tufekci, Z. (2012). Past and future divides: Social mobility, inequality, and the digital divide in Austin during the tech boom. In Straubhaar, J., Spence, J., Tufekci, Z., & Lentz, R.G. (eds.), Inequity in the Technopolis: Race, Class, Gender, and the Digital Divide in Austin. Austin: University of Texas Press, 85-108. [Davis - HN80.A934 I54 2012] (This volume also contains a number of other chapters that focus on specific aspects of the digital divide in Austin, Texas.)

Wicker, S.B., & Santoso, S.M. (2013). Access to the internet is a human right [Viewpoint]. Communications of the ACM, 56(6), 43-46. [UNC libraries]

Yu, L. (2010). How poor informationally are the information poor?: Evidence from an empirical study of daily and regular information practices of individuals. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 906-933. [UNC libraries]

Yu, L. (2011). The divided views of the information and digital divides: A call for integrative theories of information inequality. Journal of Information Science, 37(6), 660-679. [UNC libraries]

Capability/Disability Factors, including Aging

Comeaux, D., & Schmetzke, A. (2007). Web accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools. Library Hi Tech, 25(4), 457-477. [UNC libraries]

Cook, J. S., & Cook, L. (2004). The ethics of Web design: Ensuring access for everyone. In Quigley, M. (ed.), Information Security and Ethics: Social and Organizational Issues. Hershey, PA: IRM Press, 73-101. [SILS - T14.5 .I55 2005]

Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication, & Society, 9(3), 313-334. [UNC libraries]

Dudley-Sponaugle, A., & Lazar, J. (2004). Web accessibility for users with disabilities: a multi-faceted ethical analysis. In Quigley, M. (ed.), Information Security and Ethics: Social and Organizational Issues. Hershey, PA: IRM Press, 102-116. [SILS - T14.5 .I55 2005]

Ellcessor, E. (2010). Bridging disability divides: A critical history of Web content accessibility through 2011. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 289-308. [UNC libraries]

Hill, H. (2013). Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 137-142. [UNC libraries]

Loiacono, E. T. (2004). Cyberaccess: Web accessibility and corporate America. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 82-87. [ACM Digital Library]

Newell, A.F. (2011). Designing IT systems for older people [and] User sensitive inclusive design. In Design and the Digital Divide: Insights from 40 Years in Computer Support for Older and Disabled People. Morgan & Claypool, 97-106, 115-128. [UNC libraries]

Peters, C., & Bradbard, D.A. (2010). Web accessibility: An introduction and ethical implications. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 8(2), 206-232. [UNC libraries]

Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 84-91. [ACM Digital Library]

Vicente, M.R., & Lopez, A.J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divde: Some evidence for Internet use. Information Society, 26(1), 48-64. [UNC libraries]

Socioeconomic Factors

Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society, 22(5), 269-278. [UNC libraries]

boyd, d. (2012). White flight in networked publics: How race and class shaped American teen engagement with MySpace and Facebook. In Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P.A. (eds.), Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, 203-222. [Davis - HT1523 .R25123 2012]

Chen, W. (2013). The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Information Society, 29(1), 13-25. [UNC libraries]

Couldry, N. (2003). Digital divide or discursive design? On the emerging ethics of information space. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(2), 89-97. [UNC libraries]

Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97-126. [UNC libraries]

Hudson, H. E. (2004). Universal access: What have we learned from the e-rate? Telecommunications Policy, 28(3-4), 309-321. [UNC libraries]

Mitchell, W. J. (1999). Equitable access to the online world. In Schön, D. A., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W. J. (eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 151-163. [Davis - T58.5 .H55 1999]

Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communcation & Society, 12(4), 488-507. [UNC libraries]

Race/Ethnicity Factors

Fouché, R. (2012). From black inventors to One Laptop Per Child: Exporting a racial politics of technology. In Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P.A. (eds.), Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, 61-84. [Davis - HT1523 .R25123 2012]

Gilbert, M. (2010). Theorizing digital and urban inequalities: Critical geographics of 'race', gender and technological capital. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 1000-1018. [UNC libraries]

Graham, R., & Smith, D. T. (2010). Dividing lines: An empirical examination of technology use and Internet activity among African-Americans. Information, Commmunication & Society, 13(6), 892-908. [UNC libraries]

Hargittai, E. (2012). Open doors, closed spaces? Differentiated adoption of social network sites by user background. In Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P.A. (eds.), Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, 223-245. [Davis - HT1523 .R25123 2012]

Kretchmer, S. B., & Carveth, R. (2001). The color of the net: African Americans, race, and cyberspace. Computers and Society, 31(3), 9-14. [ACM Digital Library]

Kvasny, L., Trauth, E.M., & Morgan, A.J. (2009). Power relations in IT education and work: The intersectionality of gender, race and class. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 7(2/3), 96-118. [Request via interlibrary loan, from instructor, or at http://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/lkvasny/JICES-PowerRelations.pdf]

Stern, M.J., & Rookey, B.D. (2013). The politics of new media, space, and race: A socio-spatial analysis of the 2008 presidential election. New Media & Society, 15(4), 519-540. [UNC libraries]

Gender Factors

Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology. (2005). http://www.anitaborg.org/

Brännström, I. (2012). Gender and digital divide 2000-2008 in two low-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya and Somalia in official statistics. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 60-67. [UNC libraries]

Cooper, J., & Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and Computers: Understanding the Digital Divide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Math/Physics - QA76.9.W65 C66 2003]

French, S. (2002). Gender equity and the use of information communication technologies in the knowledge economy: taking a feminist poststructuralist approach. Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS '02): Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology (Raleigh, NC, June 6-8, 2002), 71-76. [Available from instructor]

Kvasny, L., Trauth, E.M., & Morgan, A.J. (2009). Power relations in IT education and work: The intersectionality of gender, race and class. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 7(2/3), 96-118. [Request via interlibrary loan, from instructor, or at http://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/lkvasny/JICES-PowerRelations.pdf]

Laurel, B. (1998). Brendal Laureal on games for girls. TED talks. http://www.ted.com/talks/brenda_laurel_on_making_games_for_girls.html.

Schinzel, B. (2007). Gendered views on the ethics of computer professionals. In Capurro, R., Frühbauer, J., & Hausmanninger, T. (eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethical Aspects in Intercultural Perspective. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 121-134. [Davis - HM851 .L63 2007]

Stepulevage, L. (2001). Becoming a technologist: Days in a girl's life. In Green, E., & Adam, A. (eds.), Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 63-83. [SILS - HQ1233 .V57 2001]

Tekobbe, C.K. (2013). A site for fresh eyes: Pinteres's challenge to 'traditional' digital literacies. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 381-396. [UNC libraries]

Turkle, S., & Dennis, P. D. (2000). Tech Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. Available at http://www.aauw.org/member_center/publications/TechSavvy/TechSavvy.pdf.

Net Neutrality

Bollman, M. (2010, Nov-Dec). Net neutrality, Google, and internet ethics. The Humanist, 70(6), 6-7. [UNC libraries]

Cheng, A.-S., Fleischmann, K.R., Wang, P., Ishita, E., & Oard, D.W. (2012). The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate: A content analysis of human valuesi n Congressional and FCC hearings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 63(7), 1360-1373. [UNC libraries]

Cheng, K.C., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Guo, H. (2011). The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 60-82. [UNC libraries]

Choi, J.P., & Kim, B.-C. (2010). Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446-471. [UNC libraries]

Crowcroft, J. (2007). Net neutrality: The technical side of the debate: A white paper. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(1), 49-56. [UNC libraries]

Kim, M., Chung, C.J., & Kim, J.H. (2011). Who shapes network neutrality policy debate? An examination of information subsidizers in the mainstream media and at Congressional and FCC hearings. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 314-324. [UNC libraries]

Krämer, J., Wiewiorra, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2013). Net neutrality: A progress report. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 794-813. [UNC libraries]

Pasquale, F. (2007). Technology, competition, and values. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 8, 607-622. [UNC libraries, via HeinOnline]

Singer, H.J., & Litan, R.E. (2007). Unintended consequences of net neutrality regulation. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5, 533-572. [UNC libraries, via HeinOnline]

Global/International Issues

Brandtzaeg, P.B., Heim, J., & Harahasanovic, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide -- A typology of internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(3), 123-138. [UNC libraries]

Buchanan, E. A. (1999). An overview of information ethics issues in a world-wide context. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(3), 193-201. [UNC libraries]

Capurro, R. (2007). African Information Ethics Conference: Proceedings. International Review of Information Ethics, 7. Available in three sections: African Information Ethics in the Context of the Global Information Society (Papers 1-15), http://www.i-r-i-e.net/1-15.htm; Information Ethics Issues in Africa (Papers 16-31), http://www.i-r-i-e.net/16-31.htm; and Action Items for the Road Ahead (Papers 32-40), http://www.i-r-i-e.net/32-40.htm.

Capurro, R. (2008). Information ethics for and from Africa. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(7), 1162-1170. [UNC libraries]

Çilan, C.A., Bolat, B.A., & Coskun, E. (2009). Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries of European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 98-105. [UNC libraries]

Howard, P.N. (2007). Testing the leap-frog hypothesis: The impact of existing infrastructure and telecommunications policy on the global digital divide. Information, Communication & Society, 10(2), 133-157. [UNC libraries]

Hudson, D. (2012). Unpacking 'information inequality': Toward a critical discourse of global justice in library and information science. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 36(3-4), 69-87. [UNC libraries]

Loo, B.P.Y., & Ngan, Y.L. (2012). Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China. Telecommunications Policy, 36(10-11), 888-900. [UNC libraries]

Parayil, G. (2005). The digital divide and increasing returns: Contradictions of informational capitalism. The Information Society, 21(1), 41-51. [UNC libraries]

Potter, A.B. (2006). Zones of silence: A framework beyond the digital divide. First Monday, 11(5). http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1327/1247.

Qadir, A. (2006). Iqbal Qadir on TEDtalks: The impact one cell phone can make on a village. TED Talks, http://blog.ted.com/2006/10/10/iqbal_quadir_on/.

Tambulasi, R.I.C. (2009). Pushed to the abyss of exclusion: ICT and social exclusion in developing countries. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 7(2/3), 119-127. [Copy available from instructor]

Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital Divides in Europe: Culture, Politics and the Western-Southern Divide. Interdisciplinary Communication Studies, 6. Oxford: Peter Lang. [SILS - HC300 .I55 T73 2011]

Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. IT and People, 21(3), 222-243. [UNC libraries]

Additional Readings

Bertot, J. C., & McClure, C. R. (1999). U.S. public library outlet internet connectivity: progress, issues and strategies. Library & Information Science Research, 21(3), 281-298. [UNC libraries]

Bodnar, C. (2004). Redlining and redefining high-speed Internet access: Policy, practice, and patchwork in urban development. In Consalvo, M., et al. (eds.), Internet Research Annual: Selected Papers from the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences, 2000-2002, Volume 1. New York: Peter Lang, 166-174. [SILS - ZA4228 .I58 v.1 2000/02]

Buré, C.E. (2006). Digital inclusion without social inclusion: The consumption of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in homeless subculture in central Scotland. Journal of Community Informatics, 2(2). Available at http://www.ci-journal.net/viewarticle.php?id=94&layout=html

Goss, E., & Gupta, U. (2003). Women and the Internet: is there an economic payoff? Communications of the ACM, 43(9 virtual extension). [ACM Digital Library]

Hofmann, J. (1999). Writers, texts and writing acts: gendered user images in word processing software. In MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press, 222-243. [SILS - T14.5 .S6383 1999]

Klecun, E. (2008). Bringing lost sheep into the fold: Questioning the discourse of the digital divide. IT and People, 21(3), 267-282. [UNC libraries]

Middleton, K.L., & Chambers, V. (2010). Approaching digital equity: Is wifi the new leveler? Information Technology & People, 23(1), 4-22. [UNC libraries]

Nardi, B. A., & O’Day, V. L. (1999). Digital photography at Lincoln High School. In Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 153-168. [Davis – T14.5 .N344 1999]

Resnick, M., Rusk, N., & Cooke, S. (1999). The computer clubhouse: technological fluency in the inner city. In Schön, D. A., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W. J. (eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 263-286. [Davis - T58.5 .H55 1999]

Viseu, A., Clement, A., Aspinall, J., & Kennedy, T.L.M. (2006). The interplay of public and private spaces in internet access. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 633-656. [UNC libraries]

Scenarios of Ethical Decisions

Mason, R. O. (2001). Hal Richards: technological change and moral response. Communications of the AIS, 7(12). [Online journal]


Return to INLS 584 Syllabus or INLS 584 Schedule


Creative Commons LicenseThe INLS 584 website, UNC-CH, 2013, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Address all comments and questions to Barbara M. Wildemuth at wildemuth@unc.edu.
This page was last modified on October 22, 2013, by Barbara M. Wildemuth.