Participation Grading Rubric

Instructor:Megan Winget Barrett
Office: 213 Manning Hall
IM: NCMeggo (I will try to log on with this username most evenings)
Office Hours: 12:15 - 1:00, Tuesday and Thursday
Class Times: Tuesdays and Thursdays: 11 - 12:15, Jan 13 - April 28

Expectations for Class Participation

General Participation = 60 points, 20% of Grade

There are 15 weeks of classes, and you'll get a weekly participation grade, graded on a scale from 0 (lowest) through 4 (highest), using the criteria below.

The criteria focus on three factors: preparation, evidence of interpretation and thoughtfulness, and persistent involvement in the class. I expect the average level of participation to satisfy the criteria for a "3". Please also see the art of participation.

Grade Criteria

0

= Absent.


1

Present, not disruptive

 

Tries to respond when called but does not offer much

 

Demonstrates very infrequent involvement in discussion


2

Demonstrates adequate preparation: knows basic facts or ideas from the readings, but does not show evidence of trying to interpret or analyze them

 

Offers straightforward information (e.g., straight from the case or reading), without elaboration or very infrequently (perhaps once a week).

 

Does not offer to contribute to discussion, but contributes to a moderate degree when called on.

 

Demonstrates sporadic involvement.


3

Demonstrates good preparation: knows facts or ideas well, has thought through implications of them.

 

Offers interpretations and analysis of case material (more than just facts) to class.

 

Contributes well to discussion in an ongoing way: responds to other students' points, thinks through own points, questions others in a constructive way, and offers suggestions for further thought.

 

Demonstrates consistent ongoing involvement.


4

Demonstrates excellent preparation: has analyzed the readings exceptionally well, relating it to readings and other material (e.g., readings, course material, discussions, experiences, etc.).

 

Offers analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of case material, e.g., puts together pieces of the discussion to develop new approaches that take the class further.

 

Contributes in a very significant way to ongoing discussion: keeps analysis focused, responds very thoughtfully to other students' comments, contributes to the cooperative argument-building, suggests alternative ways of approaching material and helps class analyze which approaches are appropriate, etc.

 

Demonstrates ongoing very active involvement.

   

Blog Expectations = 60 Points, 20% of Grade

I would like each of you to post an entry to our blog at least twice a week - on the topics listed on the "schedule", next to the week number. You will be given two points for each entry, given that:

  1. The entry is, in fact:
    1. On topic, and
    2. Timely. It's important to me that we do this on a week to week schedule - DO NOT try to do all of your blog entries for the semester in one sitting.
  2. You have provided at least three sentences contextualizing and explaining the entry for the rest of the class.
  3. n.b.: Read through the weeks' existing blog entries before posting your own! If someone else posts your entry before you have a chance to enter it, you may comment on that entry if you'd like to get the points, but the comments should be substantial (i.e., a paragraph or two). You will not get points for referring to a page someone else has already referred to.