Committee on Public Information, Section on Intellectual Property Law, American Bar Association. (2001). Intellectual Property: A Guide for Engineers: A Project for the Committee on Issues Identification, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York: ASME Press. [SILS - KF2980 .A5 2001]

Dandekar, N. (1997). Moral issues involved in protecting software as intellectual property. In Agre, P. E., & Schule, D. (eds.), Reinventing Technology, Rediscovering Community: Critial Explorations of Computing as a Social Practice. Greenwich, CT: Ablex, 73-83. [SILS - QA76.9 .C66 R47 1997]

Heckel, P. (1992). Debunking the software patent myths. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 121-40. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

League for Programming Freedom. (1992). Viewpoint: against software patents. Communications of the ACM, 35(1), 17-22, 121. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

Samuelson, P. (1998). Legally speaking: does information really have to be licensed? Communications of the ACM, 41(9), 15-20. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

Samuelson, P. (1991). Legally speaking: is information property? Communications of the ACM, 34(3), 15-18. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

Samuelson, P. (1990). Legally speaking: should program algorithms be patented? Communications of the ACM, 33(8), 23-27. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

Yoches, E. R., & Levine, A. J. (1989). Basic principles of copyright protection for computer software. Communications of the ACM, 32(5), 544-45. [ACM Digital Library, Magazines]

Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., & Sanders, G. L. (2003). Digital music and online sharing: software piracy 2.0? Communications of the ACM, 46(7), 107-111. [ACM Digital Library]

Galler, B. A. (1995). Software and Intellectual Property Protection: Copyright and Patent Issues for Computer and Legal Professionals. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. [Law - KF3024 .C6 G35 1995]

National Research Council. (1991). Intellectual Property Issues in Software. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. http://books.nap.edu/books/0309043441/html/index.html. [SILS - QA76.755 .N385 1991]

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Finding a Balance: Computer Software, Intellectual Property, and the Challenge of Technological Change. U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1992/9215_n.html. [HSL - KF3024 .C6 F494 1992]

Spinello, R. A. (1997). Case 6.3, Whose program is this? In Case Studies in Information and Computer Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 132-135. [Davis - QA76.9 .M65 S65 1997]

Spinello, R. A. (1997). Case 6.4, Doric Conversion Technologies, Inc. In Case Studies in Information and Computer Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 135-138. [Davis - QA76.9 .M65 S65 1997]

Spinello, R. A. (1997). Case 6.5, Software compatibility and reverse engineering. In Case Studies in Information and Computer Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 138-145. [Davis - QA76.9 .M65 S65 1997]

Return to INLS 105 Syllabus or INLS 105 Schedule