Average Percentage of and
Basis for Salary Improvement for Full-Time Faculty
2002-2003
School |
Percent of Improvement |
Basis for Improvement |
4.5 |
Merit, to achieve equity, other |
|
Albany |
3.7 |
Union contract, merit, to achieve equity, promotion |
Alberta |
7.7 |
Merit, across the board |
Arizona |
15.0 |
Across the board |
British Columbia |
4.9 |
Merit, across the board, to
achieve equity, career progress |
Buffalo |
0.3 |
Union contract, merit, to
achieve equity |
California – Los Angeles |
2.5 |
Merit |
Catholic |
3.0 |
Merit |
Clarion |
4.3 |
Union contract |
Clark Atlanta |
3.0 |
Merit |
Dalhousie |
2.5 |
Union contact, merit,
cost-of-living |
Dominican |
5.0 |
Across the board, promotion |
Drexel |
4.5 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
Emporia |
0.0 |
|
Florida State |
2.5 |
Merit, across the board |
Hawaii |
7.0 |
Union contract, merit,
across the board, to achieve equity |
Illinois |
0.0 |
|
Indiana |
3.7 |
Merit, cost-of-living, to
achieve equity |
Iowa |
----- |
Merit |
Kent State |
2.0 |
Union contract |
Kentucky |
3.0 |
Merit (non-recurring) |
Long Island |
3.0 |
Union contract |
Louisiana State |
5.5 |
To achieve equity |
Maryland |
0.0 |
|
McGill |
4.4 |
Merit, cost of living |
Michigan |
2.6 |
Merit, Cost-of-living, to
achieve equity, promotion, retention |
Missouri |
0.0 |
|
Montréal |
----- |
Union contract |
North Carolina Central |
0.0 |
|
North Carolina – Chapel
Hill |
----- |
|
North Carolina – Greensboro |
----- |
To achieve equity |
North Texas |
1.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
Oklahoma |
----- |
To achieve equity |
Pittsburgh |
3.5 |
Merit, cost-of-living, to
achieve equity |
Pratt |
8.0 |
Union contract, to achieve
equity |
Puerto Rico |
4.0 |
Across the board, promotion |
Queens |
5.5 |
Union contract,
cost-of-living |
Rhode Island |
----- |
|
Rutgers |
1.5 |
Union contract, merit,
across the board |
St. John's |
4.5 |
Union contract, merit |
San Jose |
----- |
|
Simmons |
5.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
South Carolina |
1.0 |
Merit |
South Florida |
1.3 |
Union contract, across the
board, to achieve equity |
Southern Connecticut |
3.0 |
Union contract |
Southern Mississippi |
0.0 |
|
Syracuse |
6.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity,
promotion |
Tennessee |
4.7 |
Merit, across the board,
promotion |
Texas |
4.0 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
Texas Woman's |
0.0 |
|
Toronto |
----- |
Merit, across the board |
Washington |
0.0 |
|
Wayne State |
3.6 |
Union contract, merit, to
achieve equity, bonus |
Western Ontario |
4.5 |
Union contract, merit |
Wisconsin – Madison |
4.0 |
Merit |
Wisconsin – Milwaukee |
3.5 |
Merit, to achieve equity |
Mean (n-48)1 |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
Mean (n-40)2 |
3.4 |
|
1.
Excludes Iowa, Montréal,
North Carolina – Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Greensboro, Oklahoma, Rhode
Island, San Jose, Toronto.
2.
Emporia, Illinois, Iowa,
Maryland, Missouri, Montréal, North Carolina Central, North Carolina – Chapel
Hill, North Carolina – Greensboro, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, San Jose, Southern
Mississippi, Texas Woman’s, Toronto, Washington.
[ Table of Contents | List of Tables | Faculty Chapter | Previous Table | Next Table ]