INCOME AND EXPENDITURE
by
John
N. Olsgaard and Jane K. Olsgaard
This section of the report provides
a descriptive analysis of the data pertaining to the financial status
of graduate programs of library and information science whose first
professional degree programs have been accredited by the American
Library Association. Complete financial data were received from all
56 of the 56 eligible schools with ALA-accredited programs.
Funding: Amounts and Sources
A total income of $143,625,039 was
reported by 56 schools; this represents an average income of $2,564,733
as shown in Table
IV-1. Funding for the
schools ranged from a high of $15,592,595 to a low of $509,178. The median income in 2000-2001 for the 56 schools
was $1,722,427, which represents an increase of 12.6 percent above
the previous year’s median income of $1,529,156.
The average income continues to increase,
and the percentage of increase continued to rebound from the smaller
increases in the late 1990's. A
review of the percentage of increase or decrease for individual schools
is reported in Table
IV-2.
The number of schools receiving increases
in total income of one percent or greater dropped from 41 in 1999-2000
to 39 in 2000-2001. The number
of schools receiving decreases of one percent or greater remained
at 14 in 2000-2001.
The frequency distribution of the total
income for schools with ALA-accredited programs is contained in Table
IV-3. Forty-four schools
reported income over $1,000,000, compared with 41 schools in 1999-00
and 38 schools in 1998-99. The
number of schools reporting income over $2,000,000 increased from
18 to 19.
In
Table
IV-4, the sources of funds for schools with ALA-accredited programs
are described for the ten-year period, 1991-92 to 2000-01. The largest percentage of funding continues
to come from the parent institution.
The percentage of support from the parent institution showed
a marked decrease after having remained reasonably steady during the
previous five reporting years.
Table
IV-5 depicts the frequency distribution of income from the parent
institution. These figures ranged from a high of $8,206,299 to a low of $383,372,
with a median income of $1,331,213. One school reported income under
$400,000, and three additional schools reported support under $600,000
in 2000-2001. Thirty-seven
schools reported support in an amount over $1,000,000 compared to
thirty-four schools last year. Thirty-three
of these 37 schools were from the United States; four were from Canada. Sixteen schools reported income from the parent
institution of greater than $2,000,000 in 2000-2001, compared with
fourteen in 1999-00.
Schools were asked to indicate if there
was any special basis for receiving funding from the parent institution,
such as FTE, credit hours generated, or head count. Table
IV-6 provides the responses received from the ALA-accredited programs.
There is little change from previous years except for a decrease
in credit hours.
In 2000-2001, the number of schools
who reported federal funding remained at 33 as shown in Table
IV-7. The mean for federal funding continued the
general increase in federal funding over the decade. The range of federal funds in 2000-2001
went from a high of $3,130,863 to a low of $1,479. (The median was $128,079). Table
IV-8 reports the frequency distribution of income from federal
funding.
Differences in income between schools
with doctoral programs and those without continue to be examined. Table
IV-9 shows that the total mean income for schools with doctoral
programs continues to be more than 2.5 times as high as that of schools
not offering the doctorate. Schools
without the doctorate continue to have greater dependence on the parent
institution than those with doctoral programs.
Income data for the ALA-accredited
schools were first examined by geographic regions in 1982-83; these
data are again presented in 2000-2001 according to the regional listings
established by the American Library Association’s Committee on Accreditation. Table
IV-10 reports these data.
Expenditures: Types and Amounts
The 2000-2001 expenditures by category
for member schools are shown in Table
IV-11, along with mean expenditures, percent of total, and ranges.
Questions relating to the library and
information science facilities were again included in 2000-2001. Schools were asked to indicate if they had
a separate library; whether the library received its major support
from the school; whether the librarian was funded by the school; and
if the library was administratively a part of the main library.
Table
IV-12a displays the responses.
Schools were also asked to indicate
if they had a separate computer lab; whether the computer lab received
the majority of its funding from the school; whether the computer
lab supervisor was funded by the school; and if the computer lab was
administratively a part of the University’s central computing facility. Table
IV-12b displays the responses.
Table
IV-13a shows the amount of support given to the library for those
schools that reported library support as a direct budget line. Table
IV-13b shows the amount of funding given to computer support for
those schools that reported computer support as a direct budget line.
Schools were asked to indicate the
allocation of salaries and wages among five categories: faculty, specialist,
clerical, students, and fringe. Table
IV-14 provides the distribution for all schools plus a comparison
for those with and without the doctoral programs.
A review of the teaching and administration
expenses by category is provided in Table
IV-15.
All
categories of expenditures were examined for schools with and without
doctoral programs, and these results are shown in Table
IV-16. Tables IV-17 and IV-18 from previous
years have been dropped from this year's report. Much of the data from these tables are included in Table IV-16.
Tables
IV-19 and IV-20
present the complete income and expenditure figures for all of the
56 schools with ALA-accredited programs.
|